Should we stop placing such high value on rare species?

Attended an interesting talk by Martin Colledge on Gisburn Forest Past Present and Future organised by the Friends of Bowland. One of the things he highlighted was a meadow restoration project at the Gisburn Forest Hub. This meadow now has an abundance of common meadow species but he said apologetically no “rare species”. I think he said this because he believed there was a lot of  “hardened naturalists” in the audience. I think it is sad that there is, I am afraid to say, a well deserved perception that naturalists value rarity above all.  I have to say I strongly disagree with ascribing this high value to rarity,  if a species is rare it is by its very nature less ecologically significant than an abundant species (excluding apex predators). I believe this attitude damages wildlife conservation because it devalues the common, the wildlife most people encounter most of the time. I also think this attitude is a barrier to a lot of people becoming more deeply involved with natural history organisations.

We have a pair of Pied wagtails and at least one Gray wagtail about the place. Interestingly every year at this time we see Grey wagtails then they disappear,  later we always see fledglings about the place for a while where they go in between no idea. Plus the first Redpolls of the year. Not seen the Starling with the damaged wing for a few days hope it has been able to rejoin its companions.

A visit to the fishery cafe end of Stocks reservoir revealed large quantities of frog spawn in the pond and a few Toads near the pond, with one pair in amplexus but no spawn in the pond or the reservoir.